About Me

Name: Ion2012
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Obama and Racism in America

   The commentators who are using Barack Obama's election as proof of how far America has come in its racial relations are the very same people who have ignored the proof of the last 20 years or more.  Pardon me, if I did not view Obama's election with the same shock as did our vacuous commentators.  Anyone who has been paying attention has noticed that the content of one's character has long been the most important factor by far in advancing in America. 
   I do not deny that racists exist and that people of color still encounter racists.  But it is rare that they can stop an African American from reaching the level that his talents should take him.  Race may still be an obstacle, but it is not a prison.  Indeed, none of us is born to equal circumstances.  That does not mean we cannot overcome our disadvantages, including the disadvantage of race.  In fact, being a racist in the workplace is far more dangerous to your career than being an African American.  The vast majority of Americans have been making decisions about others based on their character, not their skin color, for a long time.
   If that is not true, how was Obama elected?  Was there a sudden transformation of racist America?  Of course not.  America changed long ago, but this was an inconvenient fact for leaders, commentators and academics who owed their success to grievance mongering.  Those of us who live in the real world, and have seen a diverse workplace for many years, are not stunned by the willingness of Americans to judge Obama based on his abilities.  Indeed, I cannot count the times I have heard or read commentators saying that young people no longer feel the racial tensions of the past.  Why, because they grew up in a diverse environment, unlike their parents and grandparents who have been taking diversity training in schools and at jobs in America for many years, all the while imbibing our culture of many hues, yet never learned a thing about race?  Aren't youths smart compared to the hidebound racists that are older than they are? 
   The real truth is that commentators are the ones who have lived in an unreal universe where race is what stands in the way of African Americans who want jobs, want to live in the suburbs, want to go to college or even want to stroll down the street.  Yet, the commentators do not say that they or their friends are the racists.  It must be those guys in Pennsylvania in Murtha's district.  I guess you know how much power they wield over African Americans in the U.S.
   If Obama's election proved a point about racism, it was that those of us who have long denied that racism was preventing African Americans from rising in our society were right.  The first thing that happens when the content of character, rather than skin color, becomes the most important part in the judgment of human beings is not the election of a black president.  
   Yes, celebrate the election of an African American president, but don't tell me that only now has America overcome its racist past.   And, eating a little crow might be in order for our simple-minded commentators.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democracy? What Democracy

   Regardless of your views on Proposition 8, it should have resolved the meaning of marriage in California.  Certainly, the opponents of that proposition should be free to pursue its repeal according to the same process used to obtain its passage.  Yet, that is not what is occurring.  The last refuge of the despot in America is the courts.  The anti-8 forces are already mounting a legal attack designed to overturn the will of the people.  The principal argument that they have chosen, that Proposition 8 is a revision, not an amendment to the California Constitution and therefore had to be initiated by the legislature, not the electorate, would normally be laughable.  But the notion of objective judges is a fairy tale.  The only question is whether the California Supreme Court is bold enough to push its ideological agenda far enough to reverse the democratic process.  Today, the Conservative Democrat, otherwise known as a Republican in California, who occupies the Governor's mansion, has encourged the Court to do just that.  And it needs precious little encouragement.  Conservatives need to make their voices heard on this subject. This is another challenge to democracy. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Washington Post Ombudsman

Today, the Washington Post Ombusman essentially conceded the election coverage bias of her paper.  Here is one of her statements:

"One gaping hole in coverage involved Joe Biden, Obama's running mate. When Gov. Sarah Palin was nominated for vice president, reporters were booking the next flight to Alaska. Some readers thought The Post went over Palin with a fine-tooth comb and neglected Biden. They are right; it was a serious omission."
 
Cancel your paper anyway.  Newspaper ombudsmen have become a cynical device to fool subscribers into thinking that their papers are trying their best to be fair.  No ombudsman was necessary to see the blatant press bias and the press didn't care.  It saw a higher duty than merely seeking objectivity, namely, the duty to elect the Democrats.  The election port-mortems are merely exercises in expedience.  If tomorrow McCain and Obama started running against each other again, the press coverage would not change.  We need to stop funding our political opponents.  Obama proved that they've got more than enough money. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama and Gaffes

   One sign of the media's bias was the obviously disproportionate attention given to the gaffes of Palin and McCain as compared to the gaffes of Obama and Biden.  Biden, of course, could have been trashed continuously throughout the presidential campaign, if the media had a mind to.  Between his gaffes and downright fabrications SNL, for example, could have had a field day with Biden, if it thought there was anything humorous in the incompetence of its favored candidates. 
    Obama's performance yesterday, at his first post-election press conference, was far more human than would have been predicted, if you had relied only on the fawning praise that the media heaped on his extemporaeous speaking skills.  However, if you paid attention during the debates, the silver-tongued Obama never made an appearance.  Obama's press conference was consistent with that.  I can only imagine what the press would have done had George Bush unleashed a witticism about the dead JFK and his iconic widow.  I don't mean to exaggerate the significance of Obama's slip-up.  It's difficult to be funny without sometimes going too far, even if Obama understood the need for care in his first press conference, which was supposed to focus on a highly sensitive issue, the country's disastrous financial condition. I merely point out that Obama does not speak nearly as well off-the-cuff as the media has claimed and that the media can be expected to continue to treat him with kid gloves.  Now that Obama has become president, I want him to succeed, but I will not forget the way the press joined his campaign. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cancel Your Paper II

   I know some may think my "from the bottom up" protest is trivial.  It is, unless, of course, a lot of us start doing it.  I suspect that it is becoming more common.  As a conservative, it was hard for me even to imagine altering my lifelong habit of beginning the day by picking my paper off the driveway.  It took a truly abysmal performance by the press (not to mention the "entertainment" shows) to get me over the hump. For example, I didn't mind Tina Fey's mocking of Sarah Palin.  It was good, legitimate satire.  But when Fey took to the talk shows to insult Palin, I had had enough. Was Fey afraid that her her dull fans would actually think she approved of Palin because imitation is the sincerest form of flattery?  Heaven forbid, so Fey had to get out the truth on the talk show circuit.  And, then, the press actually put snippets of the Fey interviews on hard news channels to further undermine Palin.  Speaking of the overlap between entertainment and news.  Flash: CNN reports that Tina Fey thinks Sarah Palin is about as dumb as Fey herself.  Fey may have gained 10 fans for every one like me who will never see another movie she makes, but at least she won't have 11 fans.  I have also now abandoned my terribly convenient local movie theater.  Years ago, it devised a new marketing ploy, devoting a large chunk of its marquee to expressing sentiments typical of the progressive elite who live nearby:  Bush is a criminal and traitor and should be impeaced; Diebold is fixing elections (where is it when we need them?).  Again, as a creature of habit and a lover of convenience, I kept going to my local theater, blithely ignoring the marquee's dire warning me that Republicans were turning America into a police state.  No more.  And, while I'm on the subject, why do Republicans still give generously to their elite alma maters, notwithstanding that the progressive ideology is a staple there, while the ideals of limited government, self-reliance, free markets and individual liberty are only mentioned in order to ridicule.  Is it that important to help maintain the prestige of the schools we attended?  More important even than making donations to conservative educational institutions (ISI, for example) that will help turn the tide?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cancel your paper

   On election day, anticipating the impending calamity, I canceled my newspaper subscription.  No, I'm not a techie who prefers news from the internet.  I have subscribed to a daily paper for 30 years.  But it has become obvious that my paper, like many, many others, consider themselves advocacy vehicles for the Democratic Party.  I am therefore paying to help them support policies to which I object. 
   I am not saying, however, that the media was the main cause of Barack Obama's victory, just that it was a significant factor.  Perhaps, I would not have cared so much, if Obama had not been able to outspend John McCain by hundreds of millions of dollars (I know, in large part because of McCain's own sanctimonious support of campaign finance reform), but the fact is that Republicans need to try to get their spending advantage back to help compensate for the political popularity of appeals to "spreading the wealth."  At the very least, I can stop supporting Democratic views financially.
   So, after canceling my newspaper, I changed my internet homepage from MSNBC to Fox News.  I have decided to avoid movies of the stars who are actively and visibly involved in trashing Republicans (Matt Damon, John Cusack, and on and on).  I help build their reputation, which they then use to help them impose their policies on me.  I'd stop watching Oprah, too, if I had ever watched her show.   Subscriptions to Time and Newsweek?  Gone, too.  Republicans should all try this.  Democrats have politicized more and more areas of our lives.  The media, both news and entertainment, for example, unfairly and dishonestly reduced Sarah Palin to a caricature, and I say that as someone who was underwhelmed by her (what, the media couldn't think of any good jokes about Biden and Obama?).  We don't have to sell them the rope (in this case, buy the rope) to hang ourselves.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »